We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When using MathJax with reveal.js, the output looks rather ugly: This is taken from example16d.html from https://pandoc.org/demos.html.
But there is a reveal.js plugin that generates better output: This was generated using the same command, i.e.
pandoc -s --mathjax -i -t revealjs SLIDES -o example16d.html
but a modified default.revealjs template that includes
default.revealjs
dependencies: [ // ... { src: '$revealjs-url$/plugin/math/math.js', async: true }, // ... ]
I think that the we should handle the --mathjax option this way when used in combination with reveal.js.
--mathjax
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ec3992b
Thanks, I didn't know about this.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
When using MathJax with reveal.js, the output looks rather ugly:
![2017-06-18-020850_1920x1080_scrot](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6806011/27257125-9e0aa876-53ba-11e7-9565-f384d0c641bc.png)
This is taken from example16d.html from https://pandoc.org/demos.html.
But there is a reveal.js plugin that generates better output:
![2017-06-18-000217_1920x1080_scrot](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6806011/27257138-282c6af8-53bb-11e7-89da-e2aba9b0022d.png)
This was generated using the same command, i.e.
but a modified
default.revealjs
template that includesI think that the we should handle the
--mathjax
option this way when used in combination with reveal.js.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: