We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Skipped 6000 image pairs 2022-01-08 18:00:28,652 - root - INFO -
2022-01-08 18:00:28,652 - root - INFO - Before pruning: 2022-01-08 18:00:28,652 - root - INFO - Sparsity range: 0.0 -> 0.1 2022-01-08 18:00:28,652 - root - INFO -
Train Ep. #1: 4%|##3 | 465/12274 [05:52<1:17:12, 2.55it/s, loss=9.35, accuracy=nan, lr=0.0005, sparsity=1, network_width_mpl=1]
Is it normal to have accuracy=nan in the training beginning ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Super slow , 28.95s/it !!!
Train Ep. #1: 5%|##8 | 571/12274 [10:11<94:06:56, 28.95s/it, loss=9.34, accuracy=nan, lr=0.0005, sparsity=1, network_width_mpl=1]
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Skipped 6000 image pairs
2022-01-08 18:00:28,652 - root - INFO -
2022-01-08 18:00:28,652 - root - INFO - Before pruning:
2022-01-08 18:00:28,652 - root - INFO - Sparsity range: 0.0 -> 0.1
2022-01-08 18:00:28,652 - root - INFO -
Train Ep. #1: 4%|##3 | 465/12274 [05:52<1:17:12, 2.55it/s, loss=9.35, accuracy=nan, lr=0.0005, sparsity=1, network_width_mpl=1]
Is it normal to have accuracy=nan in the training beginning ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: