-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 161
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Circular Progress Indicator does not support RTL #5903
Labels
circular-progress
RTL Support
🧰 feature-request
✅ status: resolved
Applies to issues that have pending PRs resolving them, or PRs that have already merged.
Comments
Closed
Aleksandyr
added
the
🛠️ status: in-development
Issues and PRs with active development on them
label
Jan 14, 2020
Aleksandyr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2020
14 tasks
Aleksandyr
added
✅ status: resolved
Applies to issues that have pending PRs resolving them, or PRs that have already merged.
and removed
🛠️ status: in-development
Issues and PRs with active development on them
labels
Jan 16, 2020
Aleksandyr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2020
Aleksandyr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 22, 2020
Aleksandyr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 22, 2020
Aleksandyr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 22, 2020
Aleksandyr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2020
Aleksandyr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2020
Aleksandyr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
circular-progress
RTL Support
🧰 feature-request
✅ status: resolved
Applies to issues that have pending PRs resolving them, or PRs that have already merged.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The circular progress indicator doesn't have right-to-left support.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to have right-to-left support.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: