Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 22, 2022. It is now read-only.

stable/rabbitmq extra ports not working #21352

Closed
embcla opened this issue Mar 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

stable/rabbitmq extra ports not working #21352

embcla opened this issue Mar 9, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@embcla
Copy link

embcla commented Mar 9, 2020

Uncommenting the "extraports" and "extracontainerports" in the values.yaml results in intepretation errors at various points of templates/svc.yaml

Version of Helm and Kubernetes:
Helm 3.0.2
Kube 1.17.3+k3s1

Which chart:
rabbitmq

What happened:
I tried to add port 1883 which is necessary for plugin mqtt

What you expected to happen:
an additional port made available

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
enter this

  ## Extra ports to expose 
  extraPorts: 
    1883 
 
  ## Extra ports to be included in container spec, primarily informational 
  extraContainerPorts: 
    1883 

or this

  ## Extra ports to expose 
  extraPorts: 1883 
 
  ## Extra ports to be included in container spec, primarily informational 
  extraContainerPorts: 1883 

and helm will quit with a yaml parse error

@carrodher
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @embcla,

Taking into account the stable deprecation timeline, we have been started the process of moving the Bitnami Helm Charts to the Bitnami repository, see #20969 for more details.

The Helm Chart tgz continues existing in the stable repo but it would not get new updates. We also added more info and the upgrade process to start using the new repo in the README.md and NOTES.txt file #21310.

As the RabbitMQ chart is marked as deprecated in this repository, please, can you open the issue in the bitnami charts repository?

Thanks

@embcla
Copy link
Author

embcla commented Mar 10, 2020

Ok will do

closed as chart is obsolete

@embcla embcla closed this as completed Mar 10, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants