-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
api: remove mapstructure
tags fromPort
struct
#12916
Conversation
f0eb2df
to
df9fa0c
Compare
mapstructure
tags fromPort
structmapstructure
tags fromPort
struct
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is looking good @pkazmierczak! There's some stray bits to clean up but once you've done that I think we're good to merge.
This PR solves a defect in the deserialization of api.Port structs when returning structs from theEventStream. Previously, the api.Port struct's fields were decorated with both mapstructure and hcl tags to support the network.port stanza's use of the keyword static when posting a static port value. This works fine when posting a job and when retrieving any struct that has an embedded api.Port instance as long as the value is deserialized using JSON decoding. The EventStream, however, uses mapstructure to decode event payloads in the api package. mapstructure expects an underlying field named static which does not exist. The result was that the Port.Value field would always be set to 0. Upon further inspection, a few things became apparent. The struct already has hcl tags that support the indirection during job submission. Serialization/deserialization with both the json and hcl packages produce the desired result. The use of of the mapstructure tags provided no value as the Port struct contains only fields with primitive types. This PR: Removes the mapstructure tags from the api.Port structs Updates the job parsing logic to use hcl instead of mapstructure when decoding Port instances. Closes #11044 Co-authored-by: DerekStrickland <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Piotr Kazmierczak <[email protected]>
This PR solves a defect in the deserialization of api.Port structs when returning structs from theEventStream. Previously, the api.Port struct's fields were decorated with both mapstructure and hcl tags to support the network.port stanza's use of the keyword static when posting a static port value. This works fine when posting a job and when retrieving any struct that has an embedded api.Port instance as long as the value is deserialized using JSON decoding. The EventStream, however, uses mapstructure to decode event payloads in the api package. mapstructure expects an underlying field named static which does not exist. The result was that the Port.Value field would always be set to 0. Upon further inspection, a few things became apparent. The struct already has hcl tags that support the indirection during job submission. Serialization/deserialization with both the json and hcl packages produce the desired result. The use of of the mapstructure tags provided no value as the Port struct contains only fields with primitive types. This PR: Removes the mapstructure tags from the api.Port structs Updates the job parsing logic to use hcl instead of mapstructure when decoding Port instances. Closes #11044 Co-authored-by: DerekStrickland <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Piotr Kazmierczak <[email protected]>
This PR solves a defect in the deserialization of api.Port structs when returning structs from theEventStream. Previously, the api.Port struct's fields were decorated with both mapstructure and hcl tags to support the network.port stanza's use of the keyword static when posting a static port value. This works fine when posting a job and when retrieving any struct that has an embedded api.Port instance as long as the value is deserialized using JSON decoding. The EventStream, however, uses mapstructure to decode event payloads in the api package. mapstructure expects an underlying field named static which does not exist. The result was that the Port.Value field would always be set to 0. Upon further inspection, a few things became apparent. The struct already has hcl tags that support the indirection during job submission. Serialization/deserialization with both the json and hcl packages produce the desired result. The use of of the mapstructure tags provided no value as the Port struct contains only fields with primitive types. This PR: Removes the mapstructure tags from the api.Port structs Updates the job parsing logic to use hcl instead of mapstructure when decoding Port instances. Closes #11044 Co-authored-by: DerekStrickland <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Piotr Kazmierczak <[email protected]>
This PR solves a defect in the deserialization of api.Port structs when returning structs from theEventStream. Previously, the api.Port struct's fields were decorated with both mapstructure and hcl tags to support the network.port stanza's use of the keyword static when posting a static port value. This works fine when posting a job and when retrieving any struct that has an embedded api.Port instance as long as the value is deserialized using JSON decoding. The EventStream, however, uses mapstructure to decode event payloads in the api package. mapstructure expects an underlying field named static which does not exist. The result was that the Port.Value field would always be set to 0. Upon further inspection, a few things became apparent. The struct already has hcl tags that support the indirection during job submission. Serialization/deserialization with both the json and hcl packages produce the desired result. The use of of the mapstructure tags provided no value as the Port struct contains only fields with primitive types. This PR: Removes the mapstructure tags from the api.Port structs Updates the job parsing logic to use hcl instead of mapstructure when decoding Port instances. Closes #11044 Co-authored-by: DerekStrickland <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Piotr Kazmierczak <[email protected]>
This PR solves a defect in the deserialization of api.Port structs when returning structs from theEventStream. Previously, the api.Port struct's fields were decorated with both mapstructure and hcl tags to support the network.port stanza's use of the keyword static when posting a static port value. This works fine when posting a job and when retrieving any struct that has an embedded api.Port instance as long as the value is deserialized using JSON decoding. The EventStream, however, uses mapstructure to decode event payloads in the api package. mapstructure expects an underlying field named static which does not exist. The result was that the Port.Value field would always be set to 0. Upon further inspection, a few things became apparent. The struct already has hcl tags that support the indirection during job submission. Serialization/deserialization with both the json and hcl packages produce the desired result. The use of of the mapstructure tags provided no value as the Port struct contains only fields with primitive types. This PR: Removes the mapstructure tags from the api.Port structs Updates the job parsing logic to use hcl instead of mapstructure when decoding Port instances. Closes #11044 Co-authored-by: DerekStrickland <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Piotr Kazmierczak <[email protected]>
…lease/1.2.x (#15183) * api: remove `mapstructure` tags from`Port` struct (#12916) This PR solves a defect in the deserialization of api.Port structs when returning structs from theEventStream. Previously, the api.Port struct's fields were decorated with both mapstructure and hcl tags to support the network.port stanza's use of the keyword static when posting a static port value. This works fine when posting a job and when retrieving any struct that has an embedded api.Port instance as long as the value is deserialized using JSON decoding. The EventStream, however, uses mapstructure to decode event payloads in the api package. mapstructure expects an underlying field named static which does not exist. The result was that the Port.Value field would always be set to 0. Upon further inspection, a few things became apparent. The struct already has hcl tags that support the indirection during job submission. Serialization/deserialization with both the json and hcl packages produce the desired result. The use of of the mapstructure tags provided no value as the Port struct contains only fields with primitive types. This PR: Removes the mapstructure tags from the api.Port structs Updates the job parsing logic to use hcl instead of mapstructure when decoding Port instances. Closes #11044 Co-authored-by: DerekStrickland <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Piotr Kazmierczak <[email protected]>
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
This PR solves a defect in the deserialization of
api.Port
structs when returning structs from theEventStream
.Previously, the
api.Port
struct's fields were decorated with bothmapstructure
andhcl
tags to support thenetwork.port
stanza's use of the keywordstatic
when posting a static port value. This works fine when posting a job and when retrieving any struct that has an embeddedapi.Port
instance as long as the value is deserialized usingJSON
decoding. TheEventStream
, however, usesmapstructure
to decode event payloads in theapi
package.mapstructure
expects an underlying field namedstatic
which does not exist. The result was that thePort.Value
field would always be set to0
.Upon further inspection, a few things became apparent.
hcl
tags that support the indirection during job submission.json
andhcl
packages produce the desired result.mapstructure
tags provided no value as thePort
struct contains only fields with primitive types.This PR:
mapstructure
tags from theapi.Port
structshcl
instead ofmapstructure
when decodingPort
instances.Closes #11044