-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
findpeaks from pracma #11
Comments
That is generally the intent of this package, to serve as a single source of peak finding algorithms. However, I don't think that a straight port/replication of the MATLAB Also, the existing *Peak width is the only non-trivial functionality currently missing |
After a couple of hours playing around I still couldn't replicate the exact pracma findpeaks call with Peaks.jl (nor with FindPeaks.jl), so thats my motivation. I agree that the signature of pracmas Here is the code without docs:
|
I agree; it doesn't look like our current functionality would be able to replicate that. Out of curiosity, could you share what your typical function call for
Was that OK also acknowledging the change of license? The Pracma package is GPL3 while Peaks.jl is MIT. Assuming the change of license was approved, please open a PR! This definitely has some great new/different functionality. |
@laborg bravo. This is just what I need to translate phenofit into phenofit.jl (https://github.com/eco-hydro/phenofit/blob/master/R/findpeaks.R). |
Closing this due to the unresolved question about the license. Having seen this GPLv3 derivative code; I cannot personally implement this function without an OK of the license change from the original pracma author. |
hi,
I've implemented
findpeaks
as found in the pracma R package (https://github.com/cran/pracma). The original author gave his OK for a transcription into Julia, now the question is, if you are open to accept this function as a PR. (I don't want to create/register/maintain a package just for a single function, and your packagePeaks.jl
looks like a good candidate to include such a function).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: