Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[General Question]: Research Data Management #45

Open
haesleinhuepf opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

[General Question]: Research Data Management #45

haesleinhuepf opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@haesleinhuepf
Copy link
Owner

I need to understand how Research Data Management (RDM) works. I'm a scientist in a research project, where we work a lot with microscopy imaging data, and I would like to improve RDM in my project. Where shall I start?

git-bob comment

@haesleinhuepf haesleinhuepf self-assigned this Oct 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

This message was generated by git-bob (version: 0.11.0, model: gpt-4o-2024-08-06, log), an experimental AI-based assistant. It can make mistakes and has limitations. Check its messages carefully.

To start improving Research Data Management (RDM) in your microscopy imaging project, consider the following steps:

  1. Documentation: Ensure that all data is well-documented with comprehensive metadata. This includes information about the imaging conditions, sample details, and any preprocessing steps.

  2. Data Organization: Develop a clear folder structure for storing images and related data, using consistent naming conventions to make data easily retrievable.

  3. Data Storage: Use reliable storage solutions and establish regular backups to prevent data loss. Consider cloud storage options for scalability and accessibility.

  4. Data Sharing: Implement a data sharing protocol within your team, ensuring data can be accessed by collaborators while maintaining security and privacy standards.

  5. Standardization: Adopt existing standards for imaging data formats (e.g., OME-TIFF) to ensure compatibility and ease of sharing across different platforms and tools.

  6. Explore RDM Tools: Consider using tools like OMERO for managing, storing, and sharing of microscopy data efficiently. These platforms also support metadata management.

  7. Training and Policies: Provide training for your team on RDM best practices and establish clear policies to maintain consistency in data management.

Start with these foundational steps, and gradually adapt more sophisticated strategies as needed for your specific project needs.

@haesleinhuepf
Copy link
Owner Author

I don't care so much about tools, training and policies. But I would like to learn more about documentation and organization. We run a lot of experiments, where we image samples. These samples are typically saved as tif files. Some samples only result in a single image, others there are multiple files created. Afterwards, I run some scripts or jupyter notebooks to analyse the data and store measurements in .csv files and plots as .png files.

git-bob comment on how to organize this project. Come up with a proposal for a folder structure.

Copy link
Contributor

This message was generated by git-bob (version: 0.11.0, model: gpt-4o-2024-08-06, log), an experimental AI-based assistant. It can make mistakes and has limitations. Check its messages carefully.

To effectively organize and document your microscopy imaging project, I suggest the following folder structure and documentation strategy:

/ProjectName
    /raw_data
        /2023-10-10_experiment1
            - sample1_image1.tif
            - sample2_image1.tif
            - sample2_image2.tif
        /2023-10-11_experiment2
            - sample3_image1.tif
    /processed_data
        /2023-10-10_experiment1
            - sample1_measurements.csv
            - sample1_plots.png
            - sample2_measurements.csv
            - sample2_plots.png
        /2023-10-11_experiment2
            - sample3_measurements.csv
            - sample3_plots.png
    /scripts
        - analysis_script1.ipynb
        - analysis_script2.py
    /metadata
        - 2023-10-10_experiment1_metadata.txt
        - 2023-10-11_experiment2_metadata.txt
    README.md

Documentation Strategy

  1. Metadata Files: Use plain text files in the /metadata folder to document details about each experiment, including imaging conditions, sample informations, and preprocessing steps.

  2. README.md: Include a README file at the root level to provide an overview of the project structure, naming conventions, and any important instructions for users accessing the data.

  3. Consistent Naming Conventions: Use sensible and consistent naming conventions that include date, experiment id, and sample information, making it easy to correlate data and metadata.

  4. Experiment Notes: Document specific notes or observations during experiments within the respective metadata files for future reference.

This provides a scalable and organized approach, allowing easy access and understanding of your collected data and its subsequent analyses.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant