Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No such file model/coco_valid1_eval.pkl #7

Open
SilencerChen opened this issue May 14, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

No such file model/coco_valid1_eval.pkl #7

SilencerChen opened this issue May 14, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@SilencerChen
Copy link

I try to run the test code but couldn't find model/coco_valid1_eval.pkl file. Could you updata it ? Thanks so much.

@YuanEZhou
Copy link

I have the same issue. @SilencerChen @gujiuxiang

@gujiuxiang
Copy link
Owner

@SilencerChen @YuanEZhou, uploaded, pls find the file in Weiyun. Thanks.

@winnechan
Copy link

winnechan commented Mar 28, 2019

i have create a pkl file that can be loaded without coco_voc by only storing the .details.precision details.score numpy.array.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eRrH45xOj41__v2bXMVa8OGZ1Gj6NYze

using python 3 to load the python 2 pkl file:

with open(pickle_file_name, 'rb') as f:
  d = cPickle.load(f, encoding='latin1')

but there's a problem i don't know why: i can get reasonable results by removing the softmax layer in the model.

another problem is that, to me, the output before softmax seems to be the noisy-OR pooling of each image region instance, which can be used to be the final output directly without the score matching of unknown meaning.

can someone explain?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants