You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Noto Kufi Arabic is really tall: It has a line height of 1.9x em. This is compared to 1.36 em of Noto Sans UI and Noto Naskh Arabic UI - sadly there is no UI variant of Kufi. Maybe reconsider decision to use Kufi instead of Naskh (style.mss: Noto Kufi Arabic is the one that is most similiar to a Sans style)
Casablanca - first Kufi then Naskh (the middle line is the local Shilha)
The good thing about Kufi was that it seemed to be more legible at the same font size. However, the high line spacing seems to be a fixed design property of the arabic script, so that’s the price we have to pay when using Kufi.
Apart from the line spacing, there might be another argument for Nashk: Following Googles Noto page, it covers more languages and regions, so I assume it has some more glyphs than Kufi. Furthermore, it has an UI version.
BTW: It seems that in the Noto alpha version, both Kufi Arabic and Nashk Arabic are no longer available, but there is a Sans Arabic (also UI version available).
Noto Kufi Arabic is really tall: It has a line height of 1.9x em. This is compared to 1.36 em of Noto Sans UI and Noto Naskh Arabic UI - sadly there is no UI variant of Kufi. Maybe reconsider decision to use Kufi instead of Naskh (style.mss: Noto Kufi Arabic is the one that is most similiar to a Sans style)
Casablanca - first Kufi then Naskh (the middle line is the local Shilha)


Also a road shield from #2478 in Tunisia (link)
Line heights here: https://gist.github.com/jojo4u/0b9284abc03278559a5ccd8dc49d4c0e (divide text height by EM size).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: