-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider re-licensing #971
Comments
No one on our team of engineers is well versed enough to make these legal decisions, but I will bring this to our legal team for further consideration |
any progress after react post ? |
Thanks for pinging, @sirmak. For others reading this, the referenced post is https://code.facebook.com/posts/112130496157735/explaining-react-s-license/ We appreciate this request. We have seriously considered it but have decided not to change our license at this time (although the post title mentions "React's license", the body of it explains how we evaluated the question in the context of "all of our other open source" projects too). I'm going to close this as I don't think I have anything else to add beyond what's in that post. Please read it if you'd like to know more. |
Does the license affect the reference implementation only or the GraphQL specification as well? |
It doesn't seem like it, here's the issue on the spec: graphql/graphql-spec#351 |
@kaqqao - as I understand it, the license in this repo applies only to this project |
React is being relicensed to MIT: https://code.facebook.com/posts/300798627056246/relicensing-react-jest-flow-and-immutable-js/ Please give this topic further consideration |
GraphQL spec now licensed as OWFa v1.0 and GraphQL.js + Relay as MIT https://medium.com/@leeb/relicensing-the-graphql-specification-e7d07a52301b Thanks for making this change |
Hi,
I assume you are aware of the recent discussions around the so-called 'Facebook BSD+Patents License'. The Apache Software Foundation Legal Affairs Committee has announced that this license is no longer allowed to be used as a direct dependency in Apache projects. Based on this decision, the RocksDB project re-licensed their code and people have reached out to other Facebook projects to consider doing the same. (I’m not affiliated with Apache in any way.)
I understand that the decision on which license to use is completely up to Facebook and I’m grateful that you started and open-sourced GraphQL. I just wanted to make you aware that the current license prevents some companies and organisations to use GraphQL.
I would kindly ask if you would consider changing the license of this project to something that’s easier to integrate for other companies.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: