Replies: 1 comment
-
I agree with this "smart default" idea on A. Horizontal View + Matrix View (Screenshot above) {
arrangement: "vertical",
views: [
{ /* View 1: Horizontal View */ },
{ /* View 2: 2D View */ }
]
} If both View 1 and View 2 have the same B. Vertical View + Horizontal View + Matrix View {
arrangement: "horizontal",
views: [
{ /* View 1: Vertical View */ },
{
arrangement: "vertical",
views: [
{ /* View 2: Horizontal View */ },
{ /* View 3: 2D View */ }
]
}
]
}
// or
{
arrangement: "vertical",
views: [
{ /* View 2: Horizontal View */ },
{
arrangement: "horizontal",
views: [
{ /* View 1: Vertical View */ },
{ /* View 3: 2D View */ }
]
}
]
} If both View 1, View 2, and View 3 have the same |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Alignment of multiple stacked views is import for accurate comparison of features across tracks. Currently "alignment" of 1D tracks with 2D matrices is accomplished by specifying
xOffset
oryOffset
. Example:xOffset == 0
xOffset == 30
I think this most often occurs when an axis is specified for a view that is not for other views. Especially since the width and height of a track do not include the space taken by the axes. While I don't think it is necessary, it would be convenient to add this "axis padding" to tracks without requiring users to specify a pixel offset.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions