Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 13, 2023. It is now read-only.

Bindings for Instance Group Managers? #103

Closed
toots opened this issue Jun 13, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Bindings for Instance Group Managers? #103

toots opened this issue Jun 13, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
api: compute Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-compute API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@toots
Copy link

toots commented Jun 13, 2018

Hi,

Any reason the instance group manager API calls aren't covered yet? Y'all taking PR for that?

@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith added the triage me I really want to be triaged. label Jun 13, 2018
@stephenplusplus
Copy link
Contributor

Sure, a PR would be great!

@stephenplusplus stephenplusplus added type: enhancement and removed triage me I really want to be triaged. labels Jun 13, 2018
@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. and removed type: enhancement labels Dec 21, 2018
@toots
Copy link
Author

toots commented Feb 10, 2019

Feel free to go ahead. I'm slammed right now and won't have time to look at it for a while.

@stephenplusplus stephenplusplus changed the title Bindings for Instance Groupe Managers? Bindings for Instance Group Managers? Feb 11, 2019
@google-cloud-label-sync google-cloud-label-sync bot added the api: compute Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-compute API. label Jan 30, 2020
@sofisl
Copy link
Contributor

sofisl commented Jun 23, 2022

Hi, please refer to the new library, ^3.0.0.

@sofisl sofisl closed this as completed Jun 23, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
api: compute Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-compute API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants