You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the SequenceLocation within an Adjacency is expected to have either start or stop populated, but not both. The constraint that both should not be populated is not specified anywhere in the schema, which could lead to confusion (e.g., discussion #471).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'll take a stab at draft the schema change. Before I write it out, do you or @d-cameron have any thoughts on whether it should just be implemented as just a constraint on the use of SequenceLocation within Adjacency, or whether we should make a different class for a point + direction on a sequence?
Currently, the
SequenceLocation
within anAdjacency
is expected to have eitherstart
orstop
populated, but not both. The constraint that both should not be populated is not specified anywhere in the schema, which could lead to confusion (e.g., discussion #471).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: