You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The new semantics changes the meaning of (breaks) source trees containing directories already named “vendor”. Of the over 60,000 listed on godoc.org, there are fewer than 50 such examples. Putting the new semantics behind the environment variable avoids breaking those trees for now.
If they did the analysis right, we would be one of those 50. I can do this soon, it will be pretty easy. We can't use the new go vendoring experiment yet and should stick with the party tool as using the new vendoring experiment would break compatibility with 1.3 and 1.4, but I would propose external instead of vendor, thoughts?
This is minorly urgent as 1.5 is due in about two weeks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bz5-UB7g2uPBdOx-rw5t9MxJwkfpx90cqG9AFL0JAYo/edit for details
If they did the analysis right, we would be one of those 50. I can do this soon, it will be pretty easy. We can't use the new go vendoring experiment yet and should stick with the party tool as using the new vendoring experiment would break compatibility with 1.3 and 1.4, but I would propose
external
instead ofvendor
, thoughts?This is minorly urgent as 1.5 is due in about two weeks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: