We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Two options I can think of
MinerWithdrawBalace
BeneficiaryWithdrawBalance
I prefer 1 personally but that might be considered as a breaking api change. if so we might wanna do 2. @magik6k @geoff-vball - thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
discussed in standup - we will go with @geoff-vball 's reco Option 2
Sorry, something went wrong.
From an SP's perspective, I agree that option 2 would be the preferred option.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Two options I can think of
MinerWithdrawBalace
probablyBeneficiaryWithdrawBalance
I prefer 1 personally but that might be considered as a breaking api change. if so we might wanna do 2. @magik6k @geoff-vball - thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: