We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This issue was raised in #297 for search. Here I report the same issue still occurs in range_search.
search
range_search
OS: Ubuntu 18.04
Faiss version: e8c8db8
Faiss compilation options: CUDA 10.1
Running on:
Interface:
Perhaps this was fixed for index.search(Data, 10), but I get negative distances for index.range_search. Here's an example:
lims, D, I = index.range_search(data, 555) >>> min(D) -3145728.0 >>> max(D) 512.0
Is this numerical overflow?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Could you post some code to reproduce?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Seems to be an issue related to badly conditioned data, see https://github.com/facebookresearch/faiss/wiki/FAQ#why-do-i-get-weird-results-with-brute-force-search-on-vectors-with-large-components
No branches or pull requests
Summary
This issue was raised in #297 for
search
. Here I report the same issue still occurs inrange_search
.Platform
OS: Ubuntu 18.04
Faiss version: e8c8db8
Faiss compilation options: CUDA 10.1
Running on:
Interface:
Reproduction instructions
Perhaps this was fixed for index.search(Data, 10), but I get negative distances for index.range_search. Here's an example:
Is this numerical overflow?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: