DOCS: comments.md: add link to https://dokie.li/

[westurner]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (2bc9eb7) 91.48% compared to head (04d9a66) 91.48%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2001   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.48%   91.48%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         693      693           
=======================================
  Hits          634      634           
  Misses         59       59           

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytests	91.48% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[agoose77]

@westurner thanks! This is something I'd not heard of before, adding it to my bookmarks as we speak!

[westurner]

Thanks! There are so many specs in there under a very simple UI

…

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023, 5:47 AM Angus Hollands ***@***.***> wrote: Merged #2001 <#2001> into master. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2001 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMNSZTBR3EKREBGQKCOT3YH33V7AVCNFSM6AAAAAAXENHC3GVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJRGE2TCNBZGQ2DONQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.*** com>

[westurner]

Forestry.io is superseded by TinaCMS, which is open source and also does "git-sync" by writing to the git repo through the GitHub API from just client-side JS. - Src: https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms - Docs: https://tina.io/docs/forestry/missing-forestry-features @csarven @dokieli Jupyter-book Dokieli could also write to documents in a git repo from client-side JS?

…

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023, 6:03 AM Wes Turner ***@***.***> wrote: Thanks! There are so many specs in there under a very simple UI On Tue, Dec 5, 2023, 5:47 AM Angus Hollands ***@***.***> wrote: > Merged #2001 <#2001> > into master. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#2001 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMNSZTBR3EKREBGQKCOT3YH33V7AVCNFSM6AAAAAAXENHC3GVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJRGE2TCNBZGQ2DONQ> > . > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: > ***@***.*** > com> >