MAINT: Bump sphinxcontrib-bibtex version

[bryanwweber]

Hello! I'm interested in using some new features from sphinxcontrib-bibtex, so I bumped the version locally and didn't have any problems. I also ran the test suite in the repo locally and didn't encounter any new errors from sphinxcontrib-bibtex.

I did run into an error with Pytest being pinned to such an old version, because I was using Python 3.10. So I bumped Pytest too.

Thanks!

[choldgraf]

I updated pytest in another PR so merged that change into here 👍

Looks like there are some failing tests, do you have a moment to figure out what's going on there?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1513 (b19c75d) into master (8eca97d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1513   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.25%   91.25%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         686      686           
=======================================
  Hits          626      626           
  Misses         60       60           

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytests	91.25% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8eca97d...b19c75d. Read the comment docs.

[bryanwweber]

@choldgraf I reverted the change I made to get the tests passing locally but I can't figure out why the tests are failing locally >_< I'll keep trying!

[bryanwweber]

Ah, I think the tests are failing because I'm ending up with an .ipynb_checkpoints folder locally and maybe there isn't one on the test runner?

[choldgraf]

Looks good to me - tests are happy so I think we should merge it in. Sorry for the slow turnaround, it's been a busy few months!

[bryanwweber]

Thanks @choldgraf! Happy to see it merged 😁 Happy holidays!