-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automate verification of participants #1084
Automate verification of participants #1084
Comments
Both the front and back end work for this should now be available in dev; give it a spin at your convenience. |
Please confirm that this button does not appear in stage and this should be ready for stage -> prod release. |
Hi @amber-emmes Can we close this issue? |
If the button is working to your satisfaction, then yes, we can. |
Reopening this issue. @brotzmanmj Amber completed the participant verification reset automation in dev environment, this can be checked by the Operations team at any time. Also as an FYI for the Jan release, automated testing will go out in the next release alongside the lower priority home mouthwash work. Automated testing of surveys and modules will be a future task, and planning for resources and timeline allocation will be discussed. |
Hi @sonyekere I'll ask the Ops the to check participant verification reset automation in dev. For this item: "Also as an FYI for the Jan release, automated testing will go out in the next release alongside the lower priority home mouthwash work." If this is not automated testing of surveys and modules, then can you explain what this consists of? Thanks |
Adding to this thread our email conversation so we can easily access where we left off:
@Onyekere, Sandra (NIH/NCI) [C] I assume all of the above were testing in dev and the ops staff are not needed to confirm all of that. Is that correct? With that in mind, can you explain what testing is needed from the ops team to confirm this is working as expected? I’m happy to ask someone to do it if we can state the scope. And Sandra's response: For this release, Amber’s time is largely occupied with the mouthwash overhaul work, which will also help in building out the scope for testing the biospecimen work with automated testing. When time allows in this release cycle, I’ll schedule some time with DevOps to discuss this further and then provide Ops with more direction. |
Per our discussion on 1/2/2024, I willl proceed in scheduling a touchpoint. @rohanjay10 and @amber-emmes kindly review Michelle's points above. |
Hi all, below are the notes from today's call discussion. Please let me know if anything needs to be adjusted. Testing document containing the cids for vars being reset with before and after cid values put together by @amber-emmes @rohanjay10: https://nih.app.box.com/file/1741132227704 1/28 call with @brotzmanmj @amber-emmes @robertsamm @mnataraj92 @Davinkjohnson @rohanjay10 Tool goal: Reset pts and pt status to a point when they are freshly verified
Vars to incorporate
Tool is located in the Dev SMDB pt details page where a pt would edited. Red button to reset the User
Sites
Testing
Tool development is not time sensitive. |
@amber-emmes The first use case is getting participants to a "point-in-time" of being just after site verification.
For the created test accounts, ensure that the participant appears to have just been created and verified by a site. (for now it's not critical which site, but in the future we will want to ability to select the site.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: