Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please return command flowtemp #43

Closed
levran opened this issue Apr 9, 2021 · 7 comments
Closed

Please return command flowtemp #43

levran opened this issue Apr 9, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@levran
Copy link

levran commented Apr 9, 2021

Please return command flowtemp for boiler in branch v3.0.2b1.

I use this command for turnoff heating for Junkers.

@proddy
Copy link
Contributor

proddy commented Apr 10, 2021

@levran are you building the firmware yourself? If so take the latest from branch ft_webcallcmd and the command is selflowtemp

@levran
Copy link
Author

levran commented Apr 10, 2021

Unfortunately I am having difficulty compiling firmware.
It is much easier for me to use the already compiled firmware.
Tell me, what is the reason for removing the flowtemp command from the 3 version?

@SpaceTeddy
Copy link
Contributor

SpaceTeddy commented Apr 11, 2021

Hi Vlad,
I compiled the latest version of this branch for you.
It compiles with SUCCESS, but npm gave me some warnings. Hope that has no influences.

erbose mode can be enabled via `-v, --verbose` option
Building interface with npm
npm install
npm WARN @babel/[email protected] requires a peer of @babel/core@^7.13.0 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.
npm WARN [email protected] requires a peer of react@^0.14.0 || ^15.0.0 || ^16.0.0 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.

firmware.bin.zip

@proddy
Copy link
Contributor

proddy commented Apr 11, 2021

@levran the flowtemp command was just renamed. We wanted to align the naming of the commands to the MQTT values. From #35

@levran

This comment has been minimized.

@levran
Copy link
Author

levran commented Apr 11, 2021

It looks like everything is working! :)
Thank you so much!
I will figure out what's new.

@levran levran closed this as completed Apr 12, 2021
@levran
Copy link
Author

levran commented Apr 12, 2021

All working fine!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants