Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: upgrade to pnpm v9 #348

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

chore: upgrade to pnpm v9 #348

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

mcmxcdev
Copy link
Member

@mcmxcdev mcmxcdev commented Sep 16, 2024

Changes

  • update used pnpm version from 8.15.6 to 9.10.0
  • require minimum pnpm version of 9.0.0 or higher

Motivation

See #347 (comment)

Test plan

  • ensure Vercel builds successfully
  • ensure application works as expected

- update used pnpm version from 8.15.6 to 9.10.0
- require minimum pnpm version of 9.0.0 or higher
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 16, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
evm-codes ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 16, 2024 5:52pm

Copy link
Member Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @mcmxcdev and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

@mcmxcdev mcmxcdev marked this pull request as ready for review September 16, 2024 17:47
@mcmxcdev mcmxcdev requested a review from 2xic September 16, 2024 17:47
Copy link
Collaborator

@2xic 2xic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm - checked various places in the app and didn't find anything weird

@mcmxcdev mcmxcdev merged commit 6b4b8e7 into main Sep 17, 2024
1 check passed
@mcmxcdev mcmxcdev deleted the chore/upgrade-to-pnpm-v9 branch September 17, 2024 13:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants