-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
List of tests to add a [Skip] attribute to #6713
Comments
@dreddy-work, @Tanya-Solyanik - please put new flaky tests here to skip them later. |
Two tests. I think these can be fixed instead of skipped but please check before skipping them. |
|
Error message Stack trace |
This looks like a red herring, in the last week it failed twice https://runfo.azurewebsites.net/search/tests/?q=started%3A~7%20definition%3A267%20name%3A%22system.windows.forms.tests.datagridviewtests.datagridview_oncolumnheadersheightchanged_invokewithhandle_callscolumnheadersheightchanged%22 |
@jaredpar has built a monitoring bot Runfo. This bot tracks builds and failures, we should monitor recurring failures, e.g.: failed tests in the last 7 days https://runfo.azurewebsites.net/search/tests/?q=started%3A%7E7+definition%3A267. Here's an example #6739 that we created yesterday, though we should consider making the subject a little more descriptive (e.g., |
Does it ignore fail after creating issue? |
No, the bot’s purpose is to track failures, not to modify the code.
In general, I don’t think we should blindly skip every failing test, otherwise we may end up with all tests disabled.
|
Definitely not all. Only the tests that we think are failing because of possible interruptions to the events on lab machine or because of round errors while comparing the numeric values etc. In either case, intention is to confirm that is the case before disabling it. |
System.Windows.Forms.Tests.DataGridViewTests.DataGridView_GridColor_Rendering Message: |
Intermittent failure: System.Windows.Forms.Tests.Dpi.ToolStripItemDpiTests.ToolStripItems_FontScaling(newDpi: 192) Stack trace |
Created #7365. |
Do we need this bug with the Runfo App aggregating failure statistics for us? |
Given that we have the test-bug label that is added separately for each failure, we should just use that query to track the tests we need to fix. A separate tracking issue that aggregates them isn't needed. |
This Issue is a storage of all new flaky tests that should be skipped.
Problem description:
Proposed changes:
Expected behavior:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: