Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Properly account for padding in PUTARG_SPLIT with GT_FIELD_LIST #57279

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 14, 2021

Conversation

jakobbotsch
Copy link
Member

We were writing the stack part to the outgoing stack area by a loop
incrementing the offset by the written size in each iteration. However,
it is possible due to padding and optimization that the written size is
smaller than the delta to the next field. Instead, use the offset of
each field minus the offset of the first stack field to find the offset
in the outgoing arg area.

Fix #57064

cc @dotnet/jit-contrib

We were writing the stack part to the outgoing stack area by a loop
incrementing the offset by the written size in each iteration. However,
it is possible due to padding and optimization that the written size is
smaller than the delta to the next field. Instead, use the offset of
each field minus the offset of the first stack field to find the offset
in the outgoing arg area.

Fix dotnet#57064
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Aug 12, 2021
@jakobbotsch
Copy link
Member Author

No ARM32 SPMI diffs.

@@ -1169,14 +1170,19 @@ void CodeGen::genPutArgSplit(GenTreePutArgSplit* treeNode)

if (regIndex >= treeNode->gtNumRegs)
{
if (firstOnStackOffs == UINT_MAX)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if (firstOnStackOffs == UINT_MAX)
if (firstOnStackOffs == UINT_MAX)

Copy link
Member

@AndyAyersMS AndyAyersMS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@jakobbotsch jakobbotsch merged commit b2fc310 into dotnet:main Aug 14, 2021
@jakobbotsch jakobbotsch deleted the fix-57064 branch August 14, 2021 09:10
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 13, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ARM32: Incorrect split passing of promoted structs with padding
3 participants