diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.resx b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.resx index 9a8a9e9b9c..65c222218f 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.resx +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.resx @@ -1468,7 +1468,7 @@ 'Buffer.BlockCopy' expects the number of bytes to be copied for the 'count' argument. Using 'Array.Length' may not match the number of bytes that needs to be copied. - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. Prefer 'AsSpan' over 'Substring' when span-based overloads are available diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.cs.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.cs.xlf index 944f2cc45f..e1542190c5 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.cs.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.cs.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Obecné přetypování (IL unbox.any) používané sekvencí vrácenou metodou E - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - AsSpan je efektivnější než Substring. Substring provádí kopírování řetězce O(n), zatímco AsSpan ho neprovádí a má konstantní náklady. + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + AsSpan je efektivnější než Substring. Substring provádí kopírování řetězce O(n), zatímco AsSpan ho neprovádí a má konstantní náklady. diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.de.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.de.xlf index 0f821c05ed..23283d4965 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.de.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.de.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Erweiterungen und benutzerdefinierte Konvertierungen werden bei generischen Type - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - "AsSpan" ist effizienter als "Substring". Im Gegensatz zu "Substring" führt "AsSpan" keine O(n)-Zeichenfolgenkopie durch und bietet daher konstante Kosten. + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + "AsSpan" ist effizienter als "Substring". Im Gegensatz zu "Substring" führt "AsSpan" keine O(n)-Zeichenfolgenkopie durch und bietet daher konstante Kosten. diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.es.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.es.xlf index 974bc32552..5f38e768ac 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.es.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.es.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ La ampliación y las conversiones definidas por el usuario no se admiten con tip - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - 'AsSpan' es más eficaz que 'Substring'. 'Substring' realiza una copia de cadena O(n), mientras que 'AsSpan' no lo hace y tiene un costo constante. + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + 'AsSpan' es más eficaz que 'Substring'. 'Substring' realiza una copia de cadena O(n), mientras que 'AsSpan' no lo hace y tiene un costo constante. diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.fr.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.fr.xlf index 2333259a21..bea68c29d5 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.fr.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.fr.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Les conversions étendues et définies par l’utilisateur ne sont pas prises en - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - « AsSpan » est plus efficace, « SUBSTRING ». 'Substring’ effectue une copie de chaîne O (n), alors que ’AsSpan’ ne possède pas un coût constant. + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + « AsSpan » est plus efficace, « SUBSTRING ». 'Substring’ effectue une copie de chaîne O (n), alors que ’AsSpan’ ne possède pas un coût constant. diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.it.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.it.xlf index 680e3a4e9f..067378ede9 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.it.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.it.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ L'ampliamento e le conversioni definite dall'utente non sono supportate con tipi - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - 'AsSpan' è più efficace di 'Substring'. 'Substring' esegue una copia della stringa O(n), mentre 'AsSpan' non la esegue e ha un costo costante. + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + 'AsSpan' è più efficace di 'Substring'. 'Substring' esegue una copia della stringa O(n), mentre 'AsSpan' non la esegue e ha un costo costante. diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ja.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ja.xlf index 7f8679b575..f92d8da307 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ja.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ja.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Enumerable.OfType<T> で使用されるジェネリック型チェック ( - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - 'AsSpan' の方が 'Substring' より効率的です。'Substring' は O(n) 文字列コピーを実行しますが、'AsSpan' はこれを実行せず、固定コストがあります。 + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + 'AsSpan' の方が 'Substring' より効率的です。'Substring' は O(n) 文字列コピーを実行しますが、'AsSpan' はこれを実行せず、固定コストがあります。 diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ko.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ko.xlf index eae9328e21..b050438e6e 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ko.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ko.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Enumerable.OfType<T>에서 사용하는 제네릭 형식 검사(C# 'is' - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - 'AsSpan'은 'Substring'보다 효율적입니다. 'Substring'은 O(n) 문자열 복사를 수행하는 반면 'AsSpan'은 수행하지 않으며 일정한 비용이 듭니다. + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + 'AsSpan'은 'Substring'보다 효율적입니다. 'Substring'은 O(n) 문자열 복사를 수행하는 반면 'AsSpan'은 수행하지 않으며 일정한 비용이 듭니다. diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.pl.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.pl.xlf index 4d72146dc8..4b71ca74d3 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.pl.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.pl.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Konwersje poszerzane i zdefiniowane przez użytkownika nie są obsługiwane w pr - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - Ciąg „AsSpan” jest bardziej wydajny niż ciąg „Substring”. Ciąg „Substring” wykonuje kopię ciągu O(n), natomiast ciąg „AsSpan” nie wykonuje i ponadto ma stały koszt. + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + Ciąg „AsSpan” jest bardziej wydajny niż ciąg „Substring”. Ciąg „Substring” wykonuje kopię ciągu O(n), natomiast ciąg „AsSpan” nie wykonuje i ponadto ma stały koszt. diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.pt-BR.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.pt-BR.xlf index 3a1c62d635..79dc790eb6 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.pt-BR.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.pt-BR.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Ampliação e conversões definidas pelo usuário não são compatíveis com tip - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - 'AsSpan' é mais eficiente do que 'Substring'. 'Substring' executa uma cópia de cadeia de caracteres O(n), enquanto 'AsSpan' não tem e tem um custo constante. + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + 'AsSpan' é mais eficiente do que 'Substring'. 'Substring' executa uma cópia de cadeia de caracteres O(n), enquanto 'AsSpan' não tem e tem um custo constante. diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ru.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ru.xlf index 4bf7fbfb6b..1939def5a6 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ru.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ru.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Widening and user defined conversions are not supported with generic types. - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - "AsSpan" более эффективен, чем "Substring". "Substring" выполняет копирование строки O(n), тогда как "AsSpan" не имеет постоянных затрат. + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + "AsSpan" более эффективен, чем "Substring". "Substring" выполняет копирование строки O(n), тогда как "AsSpan" не имеет постоянных затрат. diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.tr.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.tr.xlf index 65b084ef90..cabfb8fb87 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.tr.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.tr.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Genel türlerde genişletme ve kullanıcı tanımlı dönüştürmeler desteklen - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - 'AsSpan', 'Substring'den daha verimlidir. 'Substring' bir O(n) dizesi kopyası oluşturur ama 'AsSpan' bunu yapmaz ve sabit bir maliyeti vardır. + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + 'AsSpan', 'Substring'den daha verimlidir. 'Substring' bir O(n) dizesi kopyası oluşturur ama 'AsSpan' bunu yapmaz ve sabit bir maliyeti vardır. diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.zh-Hans.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.zh-Hans.xlf index 6233be421a..15e05cfdc4 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.zh-Hans.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.zh-Hans.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Enumerable.OfType<T> 使用的泛型类型检查 (C# 'is' operator/IL 'isi - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - “AsSpan” 比 “Substring” 效率更高。“Substring” 执行 O(n)字符串复制，而 “AsSpan” 不执行且具有固定成本。 + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + “AsSpan” 比 “Substring” 效率更高。“Substring” 执行 O(n)字符串复制，而 “AsSpan” 不执行且具有固定成本。 diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.zh-Hant.xlf b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.zh-Hant.xlf index f2dd916660..652fa0ae1d 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.zh-Hant.xlf +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.zh-Hant.xlf @@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Enumerable.OfType<T> 使用的一般型別檢查 (C# 'is' operator/IL 'isi - 'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. - 'AsSpan' 比 'Substring' 更有效率。'Substring' 會執行 O(n) 字串複製，而 'AsSpan' 不會且有固定成本。 + 'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. + 'AsSpan' 比 'Substring' 更有效率。'Substring' 會執行 O(n) 字串複製，而 'AsSpan' 不會且有固定成本。 diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers.md b/src/NetAnalyzers/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers.md index 146dc408da..fef3fe0f69 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers.md +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers.md @@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@ It is more efficient to use 'AsSpan' and 'string.Concat', instead of 'Substring' ## [CA1846](https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1846): Prefer 'AsSpan' over 'Substring' -'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. +'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost. |Item|Value| |-|-| diff --git a/src/NetAnalyzers/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers.sarif b/src/NetAnalyzers/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers.sarif index 0e10ba0b36..be80a9a1a1 100644 --- a/src/NetAnalyzers/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers.sarif +++ b/src/NetAnalyzers/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers.sarif @@ -3032,7 +3032,7 @@ "CA1846": { "id": "CA1846", "shortDescription": "Prefer 'AsSpan' over 'Substring'", - "fullDescription": "'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.", + "fullDescription": "'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.", "defaultLevel": "note", "helpUri": "https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1846", "properties": {