-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
User onboarding #1221
Comments
Another suggestion was to have some type of visual, possibly in the user onboarding workflow, that displayed the recommended process for submitting a proposal. Something along the lines of this, but in a visual diagram:
|
I like all of these suggestions and I think they are indeed very needed. I would like to hear @MariaPleshkova about this as well. We may want to already include some drawings for that in the redesign specs.
|
I think for now, the best way to address the identity management UX is to better educate the user. That was why I thought it should be included in the user onboarding.
|
Agree with all of that above. Considering that we don't have any onboarding screens rn and some new users have no idea how to deal with some Pi features, these suggestions sound quite reasonable. |
I would recommend using Gist and linking it on Reddit, over just pasting text in Reddit. Gists have edits history. Speaking of the recommended process in general, we have Proposal Guidelines and this checklist. |
Closing due to inactivity. |
An article was written recently that gives us some feedback on the Politeia UX from the viewpoint of an outsider.
https://www.neverstopmarketing.com/a-tale-of-two-daos-and-the-rise-of-contributor-experience/
Here are some quotes.
Notifications
"Check daily to see if it has been approved. No pro-active notification or update sent (unless I missed it…which is possible)."
"Notice that more comments were added and that I was criticized (fairly) for submitting to vote too soon. (Again, I may have missed notification of the comments)"
Identity Management UX
"Also, and this isn’t a major issue, it’s frustrating to not be able to log-in from different machines unless going through the cumbersome process of identity management. It’s the total opposite of the Single Sign On experience that MetaMask offers on Web3.0"
Admin approval process
"This fee serves to reduce spamming, which is great, but it also feels like that is a high enough barrier to entry that I shouldn’t have to wait for some DCR god to grant me the “ok” on my approval or for voting."
We no longer have the onboarding modal when you login for the first time. Instead, we direct the user to the Politeia docs. I think redirecting them to the docs if fine for something like the proposal life cycle, but that we should have some type of user onboarding flow to make sure the user understand two main things:
The admin approval process could probably be better explained in the message you get after you submit a proposal. Why admin approval is required. What they can do if they've been censored.
Thoughts on this? @linnutee @fernandoabolafio @tiagoalvesdulce
This issue is meant to be a discussion. Please don't implement anything yet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: