Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New documentation on AlibabaCloud Parameter Store secret component #2071

Closed
ceshihao opened this issue Jan 2, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2111
Closed

New documentation on AlibabaCloud Parameter Store secret component #2071

ceshihao opened this issue Jan 2, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2111
Labels
content/missing-information More information requested or needed
Milestone

Comments

@ceshihao
Copy link
Contributor

ceshihao commented Jan 2, 2022

What content needs to be created or modified?

There should be docs on secret stores implementation based on AlibabaCloud Parameter Store.

Describe the solution you'd like

If PR is accepted, i will provide related documents.

Where should the new material be placed?

daprdocs/content/en/reference/components-reference/supported-secret-stores

The associated pull request from dapr/dapr, dapr/components-contrib, or other Dapr code repos

dapr/components-contrib#1402

Additional context

@ceshihao ceshihao added the content/missing-information More information requested or needed label Jan 2, 2022
@yaron2 yaron2 added this to the 1.6 milestone Jan 13, 2022
@yaron2
Copy link
Member

yaron2 commented Jan 13, 2022

@ceshihao the PR is merged into components-contrib, please create a corresponding PR in docs.

@ceshihao
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ceshihao the PR is merged into components-contrib, please create a corresponding PR in docs.

Thanks, I have submitted the docs PR.

@greenie-msft
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing issue since #2111 was merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content/missing-information More information requested or needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants