Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Define / discuss IP ranges #97

Closed
dapplion opened this issue Dec 19, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Define / discuss IP ranges #97

dapplion opened this issue Dec 19, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
@vdo @eduadiez @dapplion

Comments

@dapplion
Copy link
Contributor

dapplion commented Dec 19, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Soon to be available packages (WIFI, OpenVPN) need dedicated IP ranges. It is necessary to decide the ranges and document them properly to avoid future problems.

Current situation ranges are:

  • 172.33.10.1: Super admin. It is created when DAppNode is installed and can never be deleted
  • 172.33.10.x: Admin user.
  • 172.33.100.x: Non-admin user.
@dapplion dapplion added the question Further information is requested label Dec 19, 2018
@dapplion dapplion mentioned this issue Dec 19, 2018
Closed
@dapplion
Copy link
Contributor Author

Duplicated, github please

@eduadiez eduadiez removed the question Further information is requested label Jan 9, 2019
@lodotek
Copy link

lodotek commented Jan 29, 2022

Why did you go with 172.33.0.0/16?
dappnode/DAppNode#380

172.33.0.0/16 is not a valid RFC1918 private network and should not have been used.

@dapplion
Copy link
Contributor Author

dapplion commented Feb 1, 2022

Why did you go with 172.33.0.0/16? dappnode/DAppNode#380

172.33.0.0/16 is not a valid RFC1918 private network and should not have been used.

Hi @lodotek ! @eduadiez may be able to provide some historical background

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@vdo vdo

@eduadiez eduadiez

@dapplion dapplion

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@vdo @lodotek @eduadiez @dapplion