diff --git a/program-analysis/echidna/Exercise-8.md b/program-analysis/echidna/Exercise-8.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..084cc48b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/program-analysis/echidna/Exercise-8.md
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+# Exercise 8
+
+**Table of contents:**
+
+- [Exercise 8](#exercise-8)
+  - [Setup](#setup)
+  - [Context](#context)
+  - [Goals](#goals)
+  - [Hints](#hints)
+  - [Solution](#solution)
+
+Join the team on Slack at: https://empireslacking.herokuapp.com/ #ethereum
+
+## Setup
+
+1. Clone the repo: `git clone https://github.com/crytic/damn-vulnerable-defi-echidna`
+2. install the dependencies via `yarn install`.
+
+## Context
+
+The challenge is described here: https://www.damnvulnerabledefi.xyz/challenges/5.html, we assume that the reader is familiar with it.
+
+## Goals
+
+- Setup the testing environment with the right contracts and necessary balances.
+- Analyze the before function in `test/the-rewarder/the-rewarder.challenge.js` to identify what initial setup needs to be done.
+- Add a property to check whether the attacker can get almost whole reward (let us say more than 99 %) from the `TheRewarderPool` contract.
+- Create a `config.yaml` with the necessary configuration option(s).
+- Once Echidna finds the bug, .... well, this time to fix the issue would mean to apply completely different reward logic as in this particular solution is rather naive implementation.
+
+Only the following contracts are relevant:
+
+- `contracts/the-rewarder/TheRewarderPool.sol`
+- `contracts/the-rewarder/FlashLoanerPool.sol`
+
+## Hints
+
+We recommend to first try without reading the following hints. The hints are in the [`hints` branch](https://github.com/crytic/damn-vulnerable-defi-echidna/tree/hints).
+
+- The invariant that we are looking for is "an attacker cannot get almost whole amount of rewards"
+- Read what is the [multi abi option](https://github.com/crytic/building-secure-contracts/blob/master/program-analysis/echidna/common-testing-approaches.md#external-testing)
+- A template is provided in [contracts/the-rewarder/EchidnaRewarder.sol](https://github.com/crytic/damn-vulnerable-defi-echidna/blob/hints/contracts/the-rewarder/EchidnaRewarder.sol)
+- A config file is provided in [the-rewarder.yaml](https://github.com/crytic/damn-vulnerable-defi-echidna/blob/hints/the-rewarder.yaml)
+
+## Solution
+
+This solution can be found in [`solutions` branch](https://github.com/crytic/damn-vulnerable-defi-echidna/blob/solutions/contracts/the-rewarder/EchidnaRewarder.sol).
+
+[ctf]: https://www.damnvulnerabledefi.xyz/
+
+<details>
+<summary>Solution Explained (spoilers ahead)</summary>
+
+The goal of the rewarder challenge is to realize that an arbitrary user can call request a flash loan from `FlashLoanerPool` and borrow the whole amount of Damn Valuable Tokens (DVT) available. Then this amount of DVT can deposit into `TheRewarderPool`. By doing this, the user affects total proportion of tokens deposited in the `TheRewarderPool` (and thus gets the most of the percentage of deposited asset in that particular time on his/her side). Furthermore, if the user schedules it in the right time (once the `REWARDS_ROUND_MIN_DURATION` is reached), snapshot of users deposits is taken, the user repay immediately the loan (i.e., in the same transaction) and gets almost whole reward in return.
+In fact, this can be done even if the arbitrary user has no DVT.
+
+Echidna reveals this vulnerability by finding the right order of two function, simply calling (1) `TheRewarderPool.deposit()` (with prior approval) and (2) `TheRewarderPool.withdraw()` with the max amount of DVT borrowed in flash loan in both functions mentioned.
+
+See example output below from Echidna:
+
+```bash
+$ echidna-test . --contract EchidnaRewarder --config ./the-rewarder.yaml
+...
+
+testRewards(): failed!💥
+  Call sequence:
+    *wait* Time delay: 441523 seconds Block delay: 9454
+    setEnableDeposit(true) from: 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000030000
+    setEnableWithdrawal(true) from: 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000030000
+    flashLoan(39652220640884191256808) from: 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000030000
+    testRewards() from: 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000030000
+
+...
+```
+
+</details>