Check collision resitstance of escrow addresses when using client ids.

[DimitrisJim]

Raised by @damiannolan in slack:

Also if a new transfer channel is created with eureka/v2 and the client id is being used rather than channel id, doesn't that mean we should be rechecking the collision resistance for escrow addresses in transfer? I think it was tested for max uint32 with channel-{N} and if using client id it could be 07-tendermint-{N} or any-other-client-id-{N} which opens the door quite a bit

---

For Admin Use

• Not duplicate issue
• Appropriate labels applied
• Appropriate contributors tagged/assigned
• Estimate provided

[AdityaSripal]

Made irrelevant by #7336

[DimitrisJim]

Irrelevant. Eureka channels use the channel-N pattern.