[v7] Rebuild for libabseil 20240722, libgrp 1.65 & libprotobuf 5.27.5

[regro-cf-autotick-bot]

This PR has been triggered in an effort to update libabseil20240722_grpc165_libprotobuf5275.

Notes and instructions for merging this PR:

1. Please merge the PR only after the tests have passed.
2. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.

Please note that if you close this PR we presume that the feedstock has been rebuilt, so if you are going to perform the rebuild yourself don't close this PR until the your rebuild has been merged.

---

If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

_{This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/actions/runs/11051541056 - please use this URL for debugging.}

[github-actions]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

• No valid build backend found for Python recipe for package gz-sim7-python using pip. Python recipes using pip need to explicitly specify a build backend in the host section. If your recipe has built with only pip in the host section in the past, you likely should add setuptools to the host section of your recipe.

[traversaro]

Let first merge https://github.com/conda-forge/gz-sim-feedstock/pull/64/files .

[Tobias-Fischer]

Isn’t #64 for the v8 branch?

[traversaro]

You are right. Probably we need also to review we actually want to maintain. gz-sim7 is EOL in one month more and less (see https://gazebosim.org/docs/latest/releases/, gz-sim7 == Gazebo Garden). If we are not using it in a ROS distribution in robostack, I think we can stop doing migration on that.

[Tobias-Fischer]

I'll merge here as it doesn't seem to hurt .. let's tackle removing the Gazebo Garden branches from ABI migration separately.