Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sql: schema updates have problematic shortcomings #13804

Closed
7 of 22 tasks
knz opened this issue Feb 25, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed
7 of 22 tasks

sql: schema updates have problematic shortcomings #13804

knz opened this issue Feb 25, 2017 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
A-sql-semantics S-3-ux-surprise Issue leaves users wondering whether CRDB is behaving properly. Likely to hurt reputation/adoption.
Milestone

Comments

@knz
Copy link
Contributor

knz commented Feb 25, 2017

This is a meta issue that aims to collect and structure the various UX issues around schema changes.

Slightly related wishlist, listed here for reference but not targeted by the meta-issue

cc @vivekmenezes

@knz knz added the S-3-ux-surprise Issue leaves users wondering whether CRDB is behaving properly. Likely to hurt reputation/adoption. label Feb 25, 2017
@knz knz added this to the 1.0 milestone Feb 25, 2017
@vivekmenezes
Copy link
Contributor

closing this issue because I don't want us to be tracking meta issues. Thanks for documenting this.

@vivekmenezes
Copy link
Contributor

reopening since folks find it useful

@vivekmenezes vivekmenezes reopened this Apr 5, 2017
@jordanlewis jordanlewis modified the milestones: 1.1, 1.0 Apr 18, 2017
@vivekmenezes
Copy link
Contributor

closing in favor of https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/projects/4

Thanks

@knz
Copy link
Contributor Author

knz commented May 1, 2017

Nice initiative!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-sql-semantics S-3-ux-surprise Issue leaves users wondering whether CRDB is behaving properly. Likely to hurt reputation/adoption.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants