Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added tests #19

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Added tests #19

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

goruha
Copy link
Contributor

@goruha goruha commented Jan 17, 2025

what

  • Added tests

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added configuration for Elastic File System (EFS) component
    • Introduced new Atmos CLI configuration
    • Added DNS primary and delegated configurations
    • Created VPC configuration
    • Added account mapping configuration and related components
  • Chores

    • Updated module versions for remote state
    • Updated Go module dependencies
    • Added new test fixtures and configurations
    • Removed obsolete test script
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive test suite for EFS component
    • Introduced new testing configurations and infrastructure

@goruha goruha requested review from a team as code owners January 17, 2025 18:18
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces comprehensive updates to a testing infrastructure for AWS services, focusing on Elastic File System (EFS), DNS, VPC, and account mapping. The changes include new configuration files, test components, and module dependencies. The modifications span across multiple YAML configurations, Go test files, and module definitions, establishing a robust framework for infrastructure testing using Atmos and Terraform.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/remote-state.tf Updated module versions from 1.5.0 to 1.8.0 for vpc, eks, and gbl_dns_delegated
test/.gitignore Added entries for state/, .cache, test-suite.json, and atmos
test/component_test.go Added EFS component test suite with client creation and validation functions
test/fixtures/* Introduced multiple YAML configurations for Atmos, stacks, components, and vendor management
test/go.mod Created new Go module with AWS SDK dependencies and testing libraries
test/run.sh Removed the script

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test Framework
    participant Atmos as Atmos CLI
    participant Terraform as Terraform
    participant AWS as AWS Services
    
    Test->>Atmos: Configure test environment
    Atmos->>Terraform: Initialize components
    Terraform->>AWS: Provision resources
    AWS-->>Terraform: Return resource details
    Terraform-->>Atmos: Confirm deployment
    Atmos-->>Test: Provide test results
Loading

Poem

🐰 In the realm of cloud and code so bright,
Terraform dances with testing might,
EFS and VPCs take their stage,
Atmos guides us page by page,
A rabbit's test suite takes its flight! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 36bcc89 and da163c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/component_test.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • test/component_test.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Mergify Merge Protections
  • GitHub Check: Mergify Merge Protections
  • GitHub Check: Summary

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

mergify bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Merge Protections

Your pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid.

🟢 Require terratest

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

This rule require terratest status

  • check-success = test/terratest

@goruha
Copy link
Contributor Author

goruha commented Jan 17, 2025

/terratest

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/dns-primary.yaml (1)

4-5: Consider adding more metadata fields for better test documentation.

The metadata section could be enhanced with additional fields such as description, version, or environment to improve test documentation and maintainability.

 metadata:
   component: dns-primary
+  description: "Primary DNS configuration for testing"
+  environment: "test"
+  version: "1.0"
test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml (1)

4-14: Consider reducing configuration duplication.

The backend and remote_state_backend sections contain identical configurations. Consider extracting common values into reusable variables or using YAML anchors and aliases to maintain DRY principles.

Example using YAML anchors:

terraform:
  backend_type: local
  backend: &local_backend
    local:
      path: '{{ getenv "TEST_STATE_DIR" | default "../../../../../state" }}/{{ getenv "TEST_SUITE_NAME" | default "" }}/{{ .component }}/terraform.tfstate'
      workspace_dir: '{{ getenv "TEST_STATE_DIR" | default "../../../../../state" }}/{{ getenv "TEST_SUITE_NAME" | default "" }}/{{ .component }}/'
  remote_state_backend_type: local
  remote_state_backend:
    local: *local_backend
test/component_test.go (3)

20-20: Consider parameterizing the AWS region.

The hardcoded region us-east-2 should be configurable to support testing in different regions.

-	awsRegion := "us-east-2"
+	awsRegion := os.Getenv("AWS_REGION")
+	if awsRegion == "" {
+		awsRegion = "us-east-2" // default region
+	}

61-141: Enhance test coverage with additional test cases.

The current test suite only covers the "basic" scenario. Consider adding test cases for:

  1. Different performance modes (maxIO)
  2. Different throughput modes (provisioned)
  3. Error cases (invalid configurations)
  4. Encryption with custom KMS key

Would you like me to help generate additional test cases?


151-157: Add retry mechanism for AWS session creation.

AWS session creation might fail due to temporary network issues. Consider adding retries.

 func NewEFSClientE(t *testing.T, region string) (*efs.Client, error) {
+    var sess *aws.Config
+    var err error
+    for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
+        if i > 0 {
+            time.Sleep(time.Duration(i) * time.Second)
+        }
         sess, err = aws.NewAuthenticatedSession(region)
-        if err != nil {
-            return nil, err
+        if err == nil {
+            break
         }
+    }
+    if err != nil {
+        return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create AWS session after retries: %v", err)
+    }
     return efs.NewFromConfig(*sess), nil
 }
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/dns-delegated.yaml (1)

10-10: Fix YAML formatting.

Remove trailing spaces at line 10.

-        request_acm_certificate: false  
+        request_acm_certificate: false
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 10-10: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/vpc.yaml (1)

18-19: Consider enabling VPC flow logs for testing.

VPC flow logs are disabled, which might make it harder to debug networking issues during testing.

-        vpc_flow_logs_enabled: false
+        vpc_flow_logs_enabled: true
+        vpc_flow_logs_retention_in_days: 1
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/basic.yaml (1)

9-9: Document hostname template format.

The hostname_template uses positional parameters (%[3]v.%[2]v.%[1]v) but their meaning is not documented.

Add a comment explaining the template parameters:

+        # Template format: %[1]v=component, %[2]v=environment, %[3]v=region
         hostname_template: "%[3]v.%[2]v.%[1]v"
test/fixtures/atmos.yaml (1)

84-87: Fix formatting and improve command readability.

The command has trailing spaces and could be more readable:

-        atmos describe stacks --format json --sections=component,metadata --components=component -s sandbox
-        | jq '.[] | .components.terraform | to_entries | 
-        map(select(.value.component == "component" and (.value.metadata.type != "abstract" or .value.metadata.type == null))) 
-        | .[].key' 
+        atmos describe stacks \
+          --format json \
+          --sections=component,metadata \
+          --components=component \
+          -s sandbox \
+        | jq '.[] \
+          | .components.terraform \
+          | to_entries \
+          | map(select(.value.component == "component" and (.value.metadata.type != "abstract" or .value.metadata.type == null))) \
+          | .[].key'
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 85-85: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 86-86: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 87-87: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 87c51a4 and 36bcc89.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • test/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • src/remote-state.tf (3 hunks)
  • test/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • test/component_test.go (1 hunks)
  • test/fixtures/atmos.yaml (1 hunks)
  • test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/account-map.yaml (1 hunks)
  • test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/dns-delegated.yaml (1 hunks)
  • test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/dns-primary.yaml (1 hunks)
  • test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/basic.yaml (1 hunks)
  • test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/vpc.yaml (1 hunks)
  • test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml (1 hunks)
  • test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/tests.yaml (1 hunks)
  • test/fixtures/vendor.yaml (1 hunks)
  • test/go.mod (1 hunks)
  • test/run.sh (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • test/run.sh
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • test/.gitignore
  • test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/tests.yaml
  • src/remote-state.tf
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/dns-delegated.yaml

[error] 10-10: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

test/fixtures/atmos.yaml

[error] 85-85: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 86-86: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 87-87: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Mergify Merge Protections
  • GitHub Check: Mergify Merge Protections
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (9)
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/dns-primary.yaml (2)

1-3: LGTM! Component structure follows Atmos conventions.

The configuration follows the standard Atmos component structure with proper YAML indentation.


9-9: Add test records to record_config.

The empty record_config array won't provide adequate test coverage. Consider adding test records to validate DNS functionality.

Would you like me to provide examples of test record configurations that cover common DNS scenarios?

Additionally, run this verification to check for any existing record configurations in other test files:

test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml (2)

1-3: LGTM! Import configuration is properly structured.

The import of the account-map catalog is correctly defined and follows YAML best practices.


15-40: Consider adding environment variable validation.

While the configuration is well-structured, it heavily relies on environment variables. Consider implementing validation to ensure required environment variables are set with appropriate values.

Run this script to check for environment variable usage and potential validation points:

test/component_test.go (1)

33-45: Potential resource leak in setup phase.

The setup phase deploys DNS zones but doesn't handle potential deployment failures. If the deployment fails, the teardown might not be executed properly.

Consider adding error handling and logging:

 suite.Setup(t, func(t *testing.T, atm *helper.Atmos) {
+    t.Log("Setting up DNS zones for testing...")
     inputs := map[string]interface{}{
         "zone_config": []map[string]interface{}{
             {
                 "subdomain": suite.GetRandomIdentifier(),
                 "zone_name": "components.cptest.test-automation.app",
             },
         },
     }
-    atm.GetAndDeploy("dns-delegated", "default-test", inputs)
+    component := atm.GetAndDeploy("dns-delegated", "default-test", inputs)
+    require.NotNil(t, component, "DNS zone deployment failed")
+    t.Log("DNS zones setup completed successfully")
 })
✅ Verification successful

The review comment is valid and aligns with existing patterns

The suggested changes match the error handling pattern already used in the test phase of the same file, where GetAndDeploy results are properly checked. This consistency in error handling is important for reliable test cleanup.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Error: No shell scripts found


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the implementation of GetAndDeploy
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_ GetAndDeploy($$$) {
  $$$
}'

# Look for similar usage patterns in test files
rg "GetAndDeploy" -t go --context 3

# Find the helper package definition
fd "helper.*go" --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 988

test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/dns-delegated.yaml (1)

8-9: Use environment-specific domain names.

The hardcoded domain example.net should be replaced with an environment-specific value.

test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/vpc.yaml (1)

14-15: Verify private subnet requirements.

The configuration disables both NAT gateway and NAT instance. Ensure private subnets don't require internet access for the EFS testing.

✅ Verification successful

NAT configuration is appropriate for EFS testing

The current configuration with both NAT gateway and NAT instance disabled is correct. EFS operates within the VPC and doesn't require internet access for its core functionality or testing purposes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if any components in the test suite require internet access
rg "nat_\w+_enabled:\s*true" --type yaml

Length of output: 42


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for EFS-related configurations and private subnet usage
echo "=== Checking EFS configurations ==="
rg "efs" --type yaml -B 2 -A 2

echo -e "\n=== Checking private subnet configurations ==="
rg "private_subnets?" --type yaml -B 2 -A 2

echo -e "\n=== Checking for test documentation ==="
fd "README.md" --exec cat {} \; || true

Length of output: 45357

test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/basic.yaml (1)

14-21: Review security group configuration.

The commented security group rules suggest potential security configurations. Consider:

  1. Document why these rules are commented out
  2. If these rules are needed for testing, they should be uncommented
  3. Using specific CIDR blocks instead of 0.0.0.0/0 for better security
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/account-map.yaml (1)

23-46: Verify test-only configuration.

The static backend configuration is marked for test use only. Ensure this configuration is not accidentally used in production environments.

✅ Verification successful

Static backend configuration is correctly isolated to test environments

The verification confirms that the static backend configuration is only used within test contexts, specifically in test fixture files. No instances were found in production configurations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if this configuration is only used in test contexts
rg -l "remote_state_backend_type:\s+static" | grep -v "test/"

Length of output: 61


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, find all occurrences of static backend type with a more lenient pattern
echo "=== Searching for static backend type ==="
rg "remote_state_backend_type:\s*static" -l

# Then, look for static backend configuration block
echo -e "\n=== Searching for static backend configuration ==="
rg "static:\s*$" -A 1 -l

# Also search for any static backend related configuration
echo -e "\n=== Searching for static backend related terms ==="
rg "static_backend|static:\s*$" -l

Length of output: 682

Comment on lines +7 to +8
domain_names:
- example.net
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace example.net with a proper test domain.

Using example.net is not recommended as it's a reserved domain. Consider using a dedicated test domain or a clearly marked test subdomain of your organization's domain.

 domain_names:
-  - example.net
+  - test.your-org-domain.com
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
domain_names:
- example.net
domain_names:
- test.your-org-domain.com

Comment on lines +41 to +71
components:
terraform:
account-map:
remote_state_backend:
static:
account_info_map:
default-test:
account_email_format: aws+cptest-%[email protected]
eks: true
id: '{{ getenv "TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" | default "<TEST_ACCOUNT_ID>" }}'
ou: default
parent_ou: none
stage: test
tags:
eks: false
tenant: default
all_accounts:
- default-test
artifacts_account_account_name: default-test
audit_account_account_name: default-test
dns_account_account_name: default-test
eks_accounts:
- default-test
full_account_map:
default-test: '{{ getenv "TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" | default "<TEST_ACCOUNT_ID>" }}'
iam_role_arn_templates:
default-test: 'arn:aws:iam::{{ getenv "TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" | default "<TEST_ACCOUNT_ID>" }}:role/tester-%s'
identity_account_account_name: default-test
root_account_account_name: default-test
terraform_roles:
default-test: ''
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Remove hardcoded AWS account ID from test fixtures

The test fixtures properly use environment variables and example.com domain, which is secure. However, there is a hardcoded AWS account ID that should be templated:

  • test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/account-map.yaml: Replace hardcoded ARN arn:aws:iam::822777368227:role/cptest-core-gbl-root-tfstate-core-ro with a templated version using environment variables
🔗 Analysis chain

Review security implications of account configuration.

Several security-sensitive considerations:

  1. The email format (aws+cptest-%[email protected]) might need to be masked in test fixtures
  2. IAM role ARN templates should be reviewed for least privilege principles
  3. Consider using a more secure method for handling account IDs in test fixtures

Run this script to check for potential security concerns:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for sensitive information patterns

# Look for potential AWS account IDs
echo "Checking for AWS account ID patterns:"
rg '\d{12}'

# Look for ARN patterns
echo -e "\nChecking for AWS ARN patterns:"
rg 'arn:aws:'

# Look for email patterns
echo -e "\nChecking for email patterns:"
rg '[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}'

Length of output: 4542


- component: "dns-delegated"
source: github.com/cloudposse-terraform-components/aws-dns-delegated.git//src?ref={{.Version}}
version: add-tests
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Replace feature branch references with stable version tags

Replace the following feature branch references with the latest stable version v1.535.0:

  • dns-delegated component: replace add-tests with v1.535.0
  • vpc component: replace added-tests with v1.535.0
🔗 Analysis chain

Replace feature branch references with version tags.

Using feature branches (add-tests and added-tests) in vendor configuration can lead to instability. Consider using specific version tags once the features are merged.

Also applies to: 46-46

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if these repositories have any version tags available
gh api repos/cloudposse-terraform-components/aws-dns-delegated/tags --jq '.[].name'
gh api repos/cloudposse-terraform-components/aws-vpc/tags --jq '.[].name'

Length of output: 629


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of vendor.yaml file
cat test/fixtures/vendor.yaml

Length of output: 1795

gopkg.in/yaml.v3 v3.0.1 // indirect
)

// replace github.com/cloudposse/test-helpers => /Users/goruha/projects/cloudposse/current/cloudposse-terraform-components/test-helpers
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove or update the replace directive.

The replace directive contains a local development path that won't work for other developers.

-// replace github.com/cloudposse/test-helpers => /Users/goruha/projects/cloudposse/current/cloudposse-terraform-components/test-helpers

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
module test

go 1.23.0
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Invalid Go version specified.

Go version 1.23.0 does not exist yet (current latest is 1.22). This will cause module initialization to fail.

-go 1.23.0
+go 1.22
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
go 1.23.0
go 1.22

@mergify mergify bot added the needs-test Needs testing label Jan 17, 2025
@goruha
Copy link
Contributor Author

goruha commented Jan 17, 2025

/terratest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-test Needs testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant