[ENH] channels.tsv
and electrodes.tsv
should have a clear relationship
#2041
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Describe your problem in detail.
EEG-BIDS and iEEG-BIDS correctly differentiate between channels and electrodes. The list of channels goes into the
channels.tsv
and the list of electrodes goes into theelectrodes.tsv
.While electrophysiological channels are created from the potential difference between two or more electrodes (that is electrophysiology channels are a function of the electrodes), the
electrodes.tsv
andchannels.tsv
seem somehow independent and do not have a mechanism to indicate the relation. Here is what the EEG-BIDS specifications text for this:This lack of indicating relationship can create ambiguity. Overall there might be at least four scenarios that tools should check to determine how the channels and electrodes are related:
IMO, this ambiguity hinders the reuse and proper analysis of the datasets, and should be addressed at the specifications level, not the tools level.
Describe what you expected.
We have been discussing this issue at #1371 with @bids-standard/bep042, as EMG channels may have several electrodes associated with them (for example monopolar, bipolar, or double bipolar setups). The current suggestion (which is far from final) is to add a
signal_electrode
column to thechannels.tsv
so that the author can indicate how each channel is related to the elements of theelectrodes.tsv
, see examples of this implementation in bids-standard/bids-examples#480The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: