-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathkv11.2.html
34 lines (34 loc) · 3 KB
/
kv11.2.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset='UTF-8'>
<meta name='author' content='Shwe Zan Aung, C.A.F. Rhys Davids'>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<article id='kv11.2' lang='en'>
<header>
<ul>
<li class='division'>Points of Controversy</li>
</ul>
<h1>11.2 Of Insight</h1>
</header>
<p><span class='add'>Controverted Point</span>: That it is wrong to say “he has insight” of one who, though he has banished nescience, has thoughts not conjoined with insight.</p>
<p><span class='add'>Theravādin:</span> <a class='ref pts-cs' id='pts-cs11.2.1' href='#pts-cs11.2.1'>PTS cs 11.2.1</a>Then you must also admit it is not right to say that, when lust has departed, a man has “done with lust”. Similarly for hate, and for dullness, and for worldly corruptions generally. <a class='ref pts-cs' id='pts-cs11.2.2' href='#pts-cs11.2.2'>PTS cs 11.2.2</a> If, on the contrary, you maintain that it is right to affirm these latter propositions, then it is no less right to say, of one for whom nescience is departed, but for whom cognition not conjoined with insight is active, that he has insight.</p>
<p><span class='add'>Mahāsaṅghika:</span> <a class='pc' id='pc256' href='#pc256'></a><a class='ref pts-cs' id='pts-cs11.2.3' href='#pts-cs11.2.3'>PTS cs 11.2.3</a>But if it be right to say thus of that person, is it in virtue of <em>past</em> insight? Can he be said “to have insight” by an insight that has ceased, that is past, that has subsided? You deny this … .</p>
<footer>
<p><cite class='book' translate='no'>The Points of Controversy</cite>, an English translation of the Pali Abhidhamma Kathāvatthu. Translated by <span class='author'>Shwe Zan Aung</span> and <span class='author'>C.A.F. Rhys Davids</span>. First published by Pali Text Society, <span class='publication-date'>1915</span>.</p>
<p>This SuttaCentral edition was prepared by <span class='editor'>Manfred Wierich</span> and <span class='editor'>Ven. Vimala</span> and proofread by <span class='editor'>Josephine Tobin</span>. Some changes were introduced:</p>
<ul>
<li>Abbreviations, i.e., those of cited works and the participants in the controversies, were expanded.</li>
<li>Cross-references were linked.</li>
<li>Some typographic changes were introduced, among others, i.e.: the phonetic symbol “ŋ” was changed to the Pāli diacritical letter “ṃ”, “ô” to “o”, single quotes to double quotes, and “:—” to “:”.</li>
<li>Letter-spacing with fixed spaces was replaced with bold font.</li>
<li>The corrigenda were merged into the text. Some could not be resolved, though.</li>
</ul>
<p>This electronic version is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 3.0 licence (CC BY-NC 3.0) as found here: <a href='http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/'>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/</a></p>
<p>All copyright is owned by the Pali Text Society. See also the statement under http://www.palitext.com/ → Publications → Copyright Announcement. For non-commercial use only.</p>
</footer>
</article>
</body>
</html>