Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

re-training result, it is not good enough, can you share some advice about Hyperparameter? #19

Open
ZHANG-SHI-CHANG opened this issue Aug 16, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@ZHANG-SHI-CHANG
Copy link

ZHANG-SHI-CHANG commented Aug 16, 2019

image

this is the result of re-training autovc, first row is original mel, second is reconstruction result, third is transfer result, i use one-hot condition during re-training, the result is not good, can you share some advice? I use three loss in paper and default adam. thx~

@auspicious3000
Copy link
Owner

The model should be easy to train. I don't know what exactly is the problem by looking at the picture.

@ZHANG-SHI-CHANG
Copy link
Author

ZHANG-SHI-CHANG commented Aug 19, 2019

The model should be easy to train. I don't know what exactly is the problem by looking at the picture.

thx~, can you give some advice about hyperparameter?or some training tricks, like lr scheduler you use.

@auspicious3000
Copy link
Owner

The hyperparams are listed in the paper. I did not use any trick such as lr schedule. As I said, it is very easy to train.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants