Atomone equai airdrop to ones who voted no with veto or no on last governance which qualified for GNOLAND and for those who did not vote but got overwritten by validators vote

[tintin2828]

Just want to call out that Atomone airdrop to

1. No with veto or veto to last proposal where users qualified for GNOLAND
2. Those who did not vote and their vote got overwritten by validators yes vote. A lot of users did not have visibility on Jae messaging for this vote. If I had seen Jae reasoning I would have voted no or no with veto

[giunatale]

discussion around this is being held in #12, this is a duplicate.

plus, unfortunately, I disagree with 2 as I believe most others will do. And most of us agree we should exclude prop 69 for the very reason you have stated in 1.

more precisely regarding 2, due to how governance work it's a duty of stakers to override their validator's vote if it does not align, or re-delegate accordingly. You inherit your validator vote otherwise. This is the social contract of current cosmos governance. We can't alter this assumption when coming up with the distribution.

[jaekwon]

But it looks like the air-drop will include YES voters (they just won't get the large 2x reward on top of the default).

Definitely what's missing is a way to show analysis of proposals that everyone should read before voting. Maybe proposals can get extended with amendments.

[jaekwon]

Closing because this is a duplicate of this issue: #12 (comment)