Consider removing ANN101

[charliermarsh]

Note to self, to fill in when I’m back at my laptop.

[cosmojg]

Is ANN102 included in this discussion?

[NeilGirdhar]

Why remove ANN101 and ANN102?

But if anything, at least don't trigger on the first argument of an ordinary or class method (typically called "self" or "cls"). These have implicit types: typing.Self and type[typing.Self].

[charliermarsh]

ANN101 and ANN102 only affect self and cls respectively, right?

[NeilGirdhar]

I thought that they check all of the arguments? "Checks that function arguments have type annotations."

[charliermarsh]

It's broken into multiple rules, so ANN101 only checks self. ANN001 checks arbitrary arguments: https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/missing-type-function-argument/.

[NeilGirdhar]

Ohhh, my mistake. I confused ANN001 with ANN101. Yes, please get rid of ANN101 and 102 😄

[KotlinIsland]

Note to self, to fill in when I’m back at my laptop.

Instead of a Note to self, could we add an annotation to self?

[zanieb]

See #9689 which currently deprecate these rules