-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move Webpack Loader to its own repository #32
Comments
Just a heads up - @Poincare is working on the exact same thing right now. I do agree that it might be worth moving the loader out. |
@jtmthf Agree with moving it into a separate repo eventually, just not until I get #33 merged :) By the way, #33 implements "#import" as a set of comments since it is simpler than having to parse the actual AST of the query and pick out "@import" directives. There's also the extractgql, which is meant for persisted query support and currently provides middleware for Express as well as a persisted query network interface for Apollo Client. It is a bit undocumented right now, but that will be fixed soon. |
I think once we validate |
@Poincare any updates on this? are there blockers that need to be addressed? |
going to close this — please re-open if we think this needs to be separated. |
I've been working on the included webpack loader to add support for
@import
directives and am thinking that it could be worth moving the loader to its own repository. Beyond@import
support I have some ideas for adding options and using the loader as a tool to incorporate persisted queries and custom scalars. As the loader becomes more complex and feature-rich, it could be worth moving to its own repository.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: