Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(drag-drop): ignore enter predicate when returning item to its initial container #13972

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2018

Conversation

crisbeto
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto commented Nov 4, 2018

Something I noticed while putting together an example for the enterPredicate a while ago. Currently we allow an item to be returned to its initial container, even if the initial container isn't connected to the new one, however we don't do the same for the enterPredicate. This means that the user can get into the situation where they drag an item out, but then they're not allowed to return it, which seems weird. These changes will ignore the enterPredicate, if an item is being returned to the initial container.

…tial container

Something I noticed while putting together an example for the `enterPredicate` a while ago. Currently we allow an item to be returned to its initial container, even if the initial container isn't connected to the new one, however we don't do the same for the `enterPredicate`. This means that the user can get into the situation where they drag an item out, but then they're not allowed to return it, which seems weird. These changes will ignore the `enterPredicate`, if an item is being returned to the initial container.
@crisbeto crisbeto added the target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release label Nov 4, 2018
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Nov 4, 2018
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels Nov 6, 2018
@vivian-hu-zz vivian-hu-zz merged commit fa944b7 into angular:master Nov 7, 2018
vivian-hu-zz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2018
…tial container (#13972)

Something I noticed while putting together an example for the `enterPredicate` a while ago. Currently we allow an item to be returned to its initial container, even if the initial container isn't connected to the new one, however we don't do the same for the `enterPredicate`. This means that the user can get into the situation where they drag an item out, but then they're not allowed to return it, which seems weird. These changes will ignore the `enterPredicate`, if an item is being returned to the initial container.
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 10, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants