You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I do not understand why we need a more formal type for this. ionItem is being used only for this test, should we create a public type?
Sorry, to clarify: I don't think we need a more formal type for this--it's fine as-is. However, I expect that at some point in the (distant?) future, ion-go will have a public-facing formal type that represents any Ion value. (Similar to ion-java's IonValue class.) If/when we add that, we should replace this so we're not maintaining two data types for the same thing.
Sorry, to clarify: I don't think we need a more formal type for this--it's fine as-is. However, I expect that at some point in the (distant?) future,
ion-go
will have a public-facing formal type that represents any Ion value. (Similar toion-java
'sIonValue
class.) If/when we add that, we should replace this so we're not maintaining two data types for the same thing.Originally posted by @zslayton in #33
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: