Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] Proper unsupported notification in arm #157

Closed
joeyleeeeeee97 opened this issue Dec 23, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

[Bug] Proper unsupported notification in arm #157

joeyleeeeeee97 opened this issue Dec 23, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@joeyleeeeeee97
Copy link
Contributor

Description
Give a detailed not supporting information for Wisp2 on aarch64 linux platform.
Steps to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
run -XX:+UseWisp -version on aarch64
Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

JDK version
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Alibaba Dragonwell 8.5.5) (build 25.275-b1, mixed mode)
Execution environment

  • OS and version:
  • CPU model:
  • Number of CPU cores:
  • Size of physical memory:
  • Inside Linux container?
    • Linux container name (docker, pouch, etc):
    • Linux container version:
zhengxiaolinX added a commit to dragonwell-project/dragonwell8_hotspot that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2020
Summary: Wisp has platform-related code, which requires Wisp to be disabled in any other platform.

Test Plan: -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+UseWisp2 on AArch64 platform, also other sanity tests

Reviewed-by: leiyul, ziyilin

Issue: dragonwell-project/dragonwell8#157
zhengxiaolinX added a commit to dragonwell-project/dragonwell8_hotspot that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2020
Summary: Wisp has platform-related code, which requires Wisp to be disabled in any other platform.

Test Plan: -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+UseWisp2 on AArch64 platform, also other sanity tests

Reviewed-by: leiyul, ziyilin

Issue: dragonwell-project/dragonwell8#157
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants