Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Inconsistency in patsy requirement (README vs requirements file)) #241

Open
krishnakumarg1984 opened this issue Aug 3, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Inconsistency in patsy requirement (README vs requirements file)) #241

krishnakumarg1984 opened this issue Aug 3, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@krishnakumarg1984
Copy link

In the README, it says patsy is strongly recommended and talks about the optional requirements text file.

However, the requirements.txt file implies that patsy is a requirement and not just a strong recommendation.

It would be helpful to newcomers if this discrepancy can be resolved suitable, and the files made consistent.
@edaub
Copy link
Collaborator

edaub commented Sep 13, 2022

Yes, this is correct. patsy is now a requirement and the readme need to be updated. When installing from pip this should automatically be handled as pip uses the requirements.txt file for installation.

@edaub edaub mentioned this issue Sep 13, 2022
Merged
This was referenced Nov 4, 2022
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@krishnakumarg1984 @edaub