You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the source from aeron_udp_channel_transport_bindings.c, the code initialized aeron_udp_channel_interceptor_table_length with aeron_udp_channel_transport_bindings_table as the dividend. Whether it should be using aeron_udp_channel_interceptor_table as the dividend instead? Or is this intentional?
Although in the code the final result both are one element, if there is any possible aeron_udp_channel_interceptor_table and aeron_udp_channel_transport_bindings_table will have different number of table elements?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yingdam
changed the title
aeron_udp_channel_interceptor_table_length compute issue
[C]aeron_udp_channel_interceptor_table_length compute issue
Dec 7, 2023
In the source from aeron_udp_channel_transport_bindings.c, the code initialized
aeron_udp_channel_interceptor_table_length
withaeron_udp_channel_transport_bindings_table
as the dividend. Whether it should be usingaeron_udp_channel_interceptor_table
as the dividend instead? Or is this intentional?Although in the code the final result both are one element, if there is any possible
aeron_udp_channel_interceptor_table
andaeron_udp_channel_transport_bindings_table
will have different number of table elements?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: