You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the stroke"gou(钩)" of the component"门" of glyph"间(U+95F4)" seems not long enough. It looks like disappeared and not clear when fonts size is small, especially on the screen of cellphone.
However when "间" as a component of glyph"简(U+7B80)", the storke“gou(钩)” looks like to be normal.
My another doubt is why the component"日" looks a little different between glyph "间" and "简"and their style is not coincident although these two "间" is a same glyph.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While it's too late to fix this minor issue in Version 1.002, because the fonts were built a week ago, and are currently undergoing testing prior to their formal release, this has been noted for the subsequent version.
I noticed that the stroke"gou(钩)" of the component"门" of glyph"间(U+95F4)" seems not long enough. It looks like disappeared and not clear when fonts size is small, especially on the screen of cellphone.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/054ed/054ed17ee60067470b96a43eeff943e8ceb6779a" alt="p1"
However when "间" as a component of glyph"简(U+7B80)", the storke“gou(钩)” looks like to be normal.
My another doubt is why the component"日" looks a little different between glyph "间" and "简"and their style is not coincident although these two "间" is a same glyph.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33862/33862827a492c387049511e5e2db68e3c687bffc" alt="p2"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: