Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Glyph position of U+11C1 ᇁ #90

Closed
acuteaccent opened this issue Mar 21, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Glyph position of U+11C1 ᇁ #90

acuteaccent opened this issue Mar 21, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@acuteaccent
Copy link

u11c1-shs

When U+11C1 ᇁ is directly followed by a vowel that goes under the leading consonant (U+1169 ᅩ, U+116E ᅮ, U+1173 ᅳ, U+119E ᆞ, etc.), the glyph position of U+11C1 ᇁ looks a bit awkward. I think it needs to be moved to the right a little bit, so that it is centered.

Comparing positions with U+11AF ᆯ, without lines:
rieul-phieuph
Comparing positions with U+11AF ᆯ, with lines:
rieul-phieuph-withlines

Sorry for submitting an issue when the new version is about to be released.

@kenlunde
Copy link
Contributor

When I checked the combining glyphs for U+11C1 with those of others, the one for uni11C1.tjmo04 (CID+65033) seems to be shifted more to the left than other uni*.tjmo04 glyphs. The shifting amount seems to match your observations.

uni11c1-error

@kenlunde kenlunde added the bug label Mar 21, 2015
@kenlunde kenlunde self-assigned this Mar 21, 2015
@kenlunde
Copy link
Contributor

I looked more deeply at this issue, and will be adding the following to the "Known Issues" section of the Version 1.002 ReadMe PDF: "The glyphs for uni11C1.tjmo04 (CID+65033) and uni11D6.tjmo04 (CID+65054) need to be shifted to the right in order to better align with other jamo when combined. This issue is manifested in the Heavy weight, but affects all other weights except for ExtraLight due to interpolation."

In other words, if you use the ExtraLight weight, you shouldn't see this issue, but if you use the Heavy weight, it should look even worse. Note that I detected another glyph that should exhibit this issue: uni11D6.tjmo04 (CID+65054).

@acuteaccent
Copy link
Author

I see.
11c1and11d6

@kenlunde
Copy link
Contributor

Consolidated with Issue #99.

@kenlunde
Copy link
Contributor

Consolidated with Issue #178.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants