-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 580
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GLIBC_2.14' not found issue and report not generated #463
Comments
@aparnaNammi Thank you for the report. |
thanks .. this is the version of Linux : 2.6.32-642.11.1.el6.x86_64 |
@aparnaNammi I need to know that for any attempt to reproduce the issue you are facing. |
|
I have taken latest scan code zip and executed |
@aparnaNammi Thanks .... while you are at it: can you print And what does ScanCode say when you run |
and may be do you have a |
@aparnaNammi This may help: can you install this tool? https://github.com/nir0s/distro#installation and then run |
Hi, |
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.7 (Santiago) |
@aparnaNammi thanks. That hopefully be enough for me to debug this issue. Though per https://access.redhat.com/articles/3078#RHEL6 it looks like you are running a 6.8 Kernel, though that should not matter much. Now the difficulty for me will be to put my hands on a downloadable trial ISO for this so I could test it in a VM.... Any idea? May be the trial from https://access.redhat.com/products/red-hat-enterprise-linux/evaluation ? If not I might have to use CentOS that should be close enough. Or some old Fedora as I can read in this note: |
I have no idea Philippe.. I'm sorry |
Hi .. Any luck on the fix for this issue |
Not yet: but some progress.... I downloaded a trial of RHEL 6 I also found this thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-list/2012-August/msg00011.html which shows this is an issue other have faced @akaihola Since you run Fedora and seem familiar with the RH/RHEL/Fedora-based distros I wonder if you have any idea on what could be a fix? |
@pombredanne, I believe this is a very difficult issue to avoid as long as you distribute binaries of any required system libraries. It would help if you relied on pre-installed packages from Linux distributions instead. Also, distributing binaries forces users to trust that the committers or their toolchains didn't inject malicious code. I would prefer a more conventional installation procedure where
I see these points in the
If the installation method based on precompiled binaries is required for some users, I'd prefer those binaries to be distributed separately from the main repository, in the same way as you've done for source code of third-party libraries. An alternative installation script would install using that set of binaries. |
@aparnaNammi RHEL 6.7 comes with Python 2.6.6 as stock Python. This is not supported for ScanCode. |
@aparnaNammi I installed RHEL 6.7 in a VM and it does not have Python 2.7. |
As explained... this cannot run unless you install Python 2.7.x. Closing now |
Hi, Please resolve the below issue when I run this command :
./scancode --format html project_R1.17New/lib project_R1.17New_result_lib_3Run.html --verbose
OSError: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by /app/share/scancode-toolkit-2.0.0rc1/src/typecode/bin/linux-64/lib/libmagic.so)
Thanks, Aparna
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: