Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prover with/without Plookup #311

Open
rw0x0 opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Prover with/without Plookup #311

rw0x0 opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@rw0x0
Copy link
Contributor

rw0x0 commented Jan 31, 2025

In #308 we for the first time merged functionality that enables Plookup for the co-Builder/co-Prover. However, this requried us to make two columns in the trace secret-shared that were public before. Consequently, this has performance implications on the prover.
We should think about making a distinction between circuits that use and don't use Plookup and have a more performant prover in the latter case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant