You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am about to issue a new release of QuantEcon.py and I am thinking of incrementing our major version number to 0.4.0 due to the addition of a new subpackage (optimize). This got me thinking that the way we use version numbers in my head is:
major version = currently 0 to indicate library is in active development
minor version = new subpackage or backward incompatible change (currently 3)
minor-minor version = new features and bug fixes (currently 9)
I am about to issue a new release of QuantEcon.py and I am thinking of incrementing our major version number to
0.4.0
due to the addition of a new subpackage (optimize
). This got me thinking that the way we use version numbers in my head is:major version
= currently0
to indicate library is in active developmentminor version
= new subpackage or backward incompatible change (currently3
)minor-minor version
= new features and bug fixes (currently9
)Does everyone agree with this logic? @jstac @oyamad
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: