Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CodeCov report different coverage depending on the runner #338

Closed
chaeyeunpark opened this issue Aug 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

CodeCov report different coverage depending on the runner #338

chaeyeunpark opened this issue Aug 23, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@chaeyeunpark
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, GitHub workflow runs Dv2 or DSv2 instances (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/dv2-dsv2-series). We may have more careful use of LCOV_EXCL_LINE (http://ltp.sourceforge.net/coverage/lcov/geninfo.1.php), but its use seems limited when we anyway hit a function, but a branch inside of the function is taken depending on the runtime architecture information (as in Memory.hpp).

Related discussion can be found actions/runner#1069.

@chaeyeunpark
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closed by #340. We may revisit this issue when the problem appears again, or we have dedicated coverage runners for AVX2/512 architectures.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant