You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reproduce:
open with default values (in Apparent & Real; Apparent = 100, Real = 87)
Change to Real & Phase Angle.
Try to change Real to 2000 --> error
I think it is basing the limit in real on the apparent that was calculated
reset example
change to Real & Phase Angle
Real = 2000
SLOWS DOWN GETS WEIRD. no errors in console. I think b/c of the above problem, but not sure.
I think it is also bugging with Reactive & Phase Angle.
I'm guessing that the validation comparing to Real is always in place, and when Real is being calculated the validation is stopping calculations before Real is calculated b/c the Apparent or Reactive is too big compared to the Real.
Some of the weird comes from just putting in 2000 for one of the power. it is making the graph have to do too much labeling. axis labeling should be a bit more based on inputs. I'm guessing something got put in b/c of Chris. Let me know if this is conflicting with previous stuff and we need to untangle priorities.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Validation coming up inappropriately
Reproduce:
open with default values (in Apparent & Real; Apparent = 100, Real = 87)
Change to Real & Phase Angle.
Try to change Real to 2000 --> error
I think it is basing the limit in real on the apparent that was calculated
reset example
change to Real & Phase Angle
Real = 2000
SLOWS DOWN GETS WEIRD. no errors in console. I think b/c of the above problem, but not sure.
I think it is also bugging with Reactive & Phase Angle.
I'm guessing that the validation comparing to Real is always in place, and when Real is being calculated the validation is stopping calculations before Real is calculated b/c the Apparent or Reactive is too big compared to the Real.
Some of the weird comes from just putting in 2000 for one of the power. it is making the graph have to do too much labeling. axis labeling should be a bit more based on inputs. I'm guessing something got put in b/c of Chris. Let me know if this is conflicting with previous stuff and we need to untangle priorities.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: